Lease Audit Information
TOPIC OF THE WEEK:
Income Generated in the Common Areas
A growing concern for
many retailers has been the significant increase in kiosks,
pushcarts and retail merchandising units (RMUs) in the common
areas of shopping centers. This is a concern for a number
of reasons, including: 1) the sales generated by these common
area tenants or licensees takes away sales from the regular
in-line tenants, 2) these common area tenants can clutter
the common areas and deter customers from exploring the
center and/or reaching an in-line destination, and 3) the
in-line tenants pay for the maintenance and operation of
the common areas, but rarely do the common area tenants
share in such costs and rarely do Landlords credit CAM with
any contribution or portion of the rent paid by the common
area tenants.
Most Landlords are aware or at least beginning to
recognize that retailers are concerned:
"We've caused some retailers to despise us; we've prostituted
common areas in search of NOI [net operating income] growth.
[Inline] retailers object to the sheer magnitude of merchandise
and the 'cloud of merchandise' they find in front of their
storefront," said Duffy Weir, vice president of specialty
leasing and marketing for The Rouse Co., Columbia, Md.,
during a joint retailer/developer panel at ICSC's Temporary
Tenants Conference. (Shopping
Centers Today, April 2001)
While most leases give the Landlord the right to use the
common areas as it pleases, the majority of leases that
are more than a few years old do not contemplate income
generated in the common areas, because this was not a prevalent
issue at the time. Many centers had a few kiosks, such as
the Sunglass Hut or Things Remembered, but the effect on
the common areas and the income generated by these tenants
was limited. However, in recent years Landlords have discovered
that they can make millions of dollars, in some cases, by
filling up the common areas with kiosks, pushcarts and RMU's
at the expense of the in-line tenants who pay for the maintenance
and operation of the common areas. (See
"Shopping Centers Today", February 2001 and
April
2001 issues or
"Shopping Center World" July 2000 issue.)
Some Landlords even include the cost of the pushcart or
kiosk in the CAM costs!
In our opinion, the practice of not crediting the income
generated in the common areas to the costs in which the
in-line tenants share is a violation of the Landlord's fiduciary
responsibility to act in the best interest of the tenants.
There is also an implied covenant of good faith and fair
dealing in all contracts which would be overridden only
by an express term in the contract. Unless there is specific
language in the lease to the contrary, Landlords should
not profit at the expense of the tenants.
As reflected in the above quotation, some Landlords are
beginning to understand that this practice is not fair and
that it undermines a key principle in successful shopping
center management: if the tenants are successful, the shopping
center will be successful. If Landlords credited this income
to CAM, it would greatly reduce the occupancy costs of the
in-line tenants, which in turn may reduce the number of
vacancies in the center. This could result in a higher occupancy
percentage and greater rental income for the Landlord.
We also feel that the reduced occupancy costs would go a
long way toward alleviating the concerns of the in-line
tenant over lost sales and cluttered common areas. Hopefully
more Landlords will start to agree with this way of thinking
and start to work with their tenants instead of against
them.
If you have
any questions, concerns or ideas for this site, please do
not hesitate to contact us!
|